A streamer could go on stream and test 10 different mice, and then go back and show everyone which mouse allowed them to perform better. Someone would simply need to write down the time at which they switched devices, and then they can go into the stats page, select the range, and write down the stats they want to know, and then compare those results. Being able to go into the line graph that includes every single round for the last week/month and select the range to use for stats would be helpful. These would be additional options to add to graphs and stat sheets to understand your ideal settings.Ħ) Let's say I got a new mouse and want to test if it is better than the old one. ![]() At the end of each scenario you can get a list of targets organized by distance apart telling you your maximum cursor velocity, flick time, micro correct time, angle between flick and micro correcting etc etc. The future of aim trainers will be data driven, and have things like flick time, micro correct time, flick accuracy (and will allow the formula's to be modified by the user!). So either having an option to throw out low scores beyond a certain variance, or being able to click on and delete the low scores from a line graph would be helpful. Sometimes you are just trying something new, using some warm up technique, or not even playing the scenario when the timer runs out, and it gives you a bad score that does not reflect your skill level. Now the weighted average score is 93.6 and not 91.ĥ) Additional options. So I may feel that smoothbot is needed, but is not as important as the others, so I give it a half weight. A quick check of your stats will tell you.Ĥ) Even deeper would allow a user to weight the value of each scenario in their mix. Maybe changing up the sensitivity improves your smoothbot score which you feel is important, and maybe it lowers your other scores, or maybe not. So on the bar graph for 45cm it would show 91, and you could compare this to other sensitivities. At 45cm/360 the percentile (high or average) scores were 73, 98, 97, 96. So maybe smoothbot voltaic, 1w6ts extra small, tamspeed 2bpes, reflex micro would be chosen. So clicking one of the previous bars will drill down to see a line graph with all the scores for that sensitivity.įiguring out the ideal range of sensitivities for a given scenario, and then doing this for multiple scenarios that reflect, let's say, all of Valorant's aiming situations would then give you your ideal range of valorant sensitivities.ģ) So to get even deeper and still very useful would be to have a user chosen blend of scenarios they feel captures their game of choice, which would then average the percentile scores for each sensitivity. So there will be a bar graph where the x axis is the different sensitivities played for that scenario, and the y is the highest score for each, or the average score for each.Ģ) Or maybe I want to see all my scores in a graph at only 45cm/360. The same person would choose a different sensitivity for each if they wanted to maximize their top score.ġ) So maybe on 1w6ts I want to see the high scores, or the average scores for each sensitivity. For example, a tracking scenario with a very large bot that spins around in a 360 circle incredibly fast would have a very different ideal sensitivity than a scenario where you have to click on a pixel sized target that is very close to other targets. So it does relate before I started aim training I could snipe but I had no tracking or ability to flick consistently on targets or just hold my cross hair on the target I am constantly top of the scoreboard granted still have bad days but that comes with gaming.There is an ideal range of sensitivities for each person for each scenario, so anything that can help sort out the different scores with different sensitivities to help identify the optimal range would be helpful. I play both aim labs and kovaac both have increased my kills in every game I play now. So aim labs seems to be spot on about how precise I am and where I should be ranked. ![]() But for almost every task I do I’m hitting high 90’s in accuracy. I do not play precision tasks either tracking and flicking predominately. 01% for precision and wanted to see if I was legit and could do it again I did on all four. I have made 4 accounts in aim labs either just forgetting sign in and because I made it to.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |